Do Governments still have an integral role in supporting the creative industries?

Creative industries not only work as entertainment to their countries’ citizens and internationally, and as profitable for the economy but also potentially act as employment opportunities (Pratt and Jeffcut, 2009), as almost travel campaigns (albeit sometimes not in the most favourable or realistic ways), and help with social/cultural preservation (Goto, 2017). 

Government help and support in creative industries is vital. Without government support, I believe both creative and entertainment industries would almost fail to exist. Cultural and creative industries generated $111.7 billion in Australia in 2016-17, equating to 6.4% of the GDP. Furthermore, in 2016, 5.5% of working Australians (or around 593,830 people) were in creative employment. Without industries like these countries lose their individuality as well as parts of their culture and hundreds of thousands of people would lose their employment.

In the ‘golden age’ of Australian films, between the 70s and the 90s, government support for films was much easier to get and more abundant than it is these days, as the current government turns a blind eye to many of the creative industries, in favour for ‘more profitable (but really just more destructive) industries. 

If our government in Australia showed more interest in our film industry, I believe there’s a good chance that the movies would be better received in our country, as the government’s beliefs often dictate the attitudes of its citizens. For some reason, TV shows have managed to avoid the detrimental effect of loss of interest from their native audience. Shows like Neighbours, Home and Away etc, have managed to capture interest and continually find new fans, while the film industry has seemed to go from weakness to weakness.

Understandably there’s still support out there for the creative and especially in screen industries in Australia. Screen Australia especially has many grants available but the support seems to kind of end there. If there were more, clearer streams of support for young Australians to get into creative industries, I think without a doubt that the industry in Australia would become larger and more successful than it already is. Furthermore, I think if they supported it, it would help people, especially Australians, from discounting their countries’ films, and we would have more great movies such as Candy (2006), The Proposition (2005), The Tracker (2002) and so on.

By creating a stronger industry in Australia, our most talented creative citizens would stop travelling overseas to work in more developed industries to feel more appreciated and to earn more money/help their careers grow. I think this applies to all creative industries as well and not just film. Musicians, artists, photographers and other creatives often travel overseas to make a more sustainable income and flow or work, which realistically with more support from the government could definitely be seen in Australia. 

Source

Why Do Governments Financially Support the Creative Industries? By Zakuko Goto, 2017

Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy: Snake oil for the 21st Century? By A. C. Pratt & Paul Jeffcutt, 2009

What is quality TV? How might the demand for content intersect with translations of popular genres?

P1

Quality TV is a completely objective term, used by ‘TV scholars, critics and broadcast agency groups’ to describe TV content which they argue is “higher quality due to its subject matter, style, or content.

American media scholar Robert Thompson defines quality television as having the following characteristics:

  • Breaks the established rules of television and is like nothing that has come before.
  • Produced by people of quality aesthetic ancestry, who have honed their skills in other areas, particularly film. 
  • Attracts a quality audience.
  • Succeeds against the odds, after initial struggles.
  • Has a large ensemble cast which allows for multiple plot lines.
  • Has memory, referring back to previous episodes and seasons in the development of plot.
  • Defies genre classification.
  • Tends to be literary.
  • Contains sharp social and cultural criticisms with cultural references and allusions to popular culture.
  • Tends toward the controversial.
  • Aspires toward realism.
  • Recognised and appreciated by critics, with awards and critical acclaim.

While one of the characteristics is “defies genre classification”, it seems as though drama-based TV shows are the only genre related to as ‘quality tv’, at least by ‘TV scholars, critics and broadcast agency groups’. This may be due to the ‘serious tones’ that are seen in them compared to say a comedy TV show, which can be quickly interpreted as ‘cheap entertainment’, especially by ‘TV scholars’, who believe their opinion outweighs quality of entertainment.

As another one of Thompson’s characteristics of quality TV states, it is produced by people of quality aesthetic ancestry. This is an aspect I feel is also mostly found in dramatic TV shows. I feel like it’s quite uncommon for a comedy tv show to feature ‘quality’ actors, especially without becoming an apparent cash grab, maybe holding its foundations for a few episodes before falling short. 

While some shows regarded as quality tv include The Sopranos and The Wire, which aren’t regarded as purely drama, they still contain elements making them crime-drama rather than just a purely crime show. Maybe it’s the need for a show to ‘move’ people that makes a show ‘quality TV’ in the ever superior eyes of media scholars.

All in all, I don’t know If i believe ‘quality tv’ is really a term I understand or believe in. I think it seems to be a chauvinistic term that media scholars can use in order to argue their tastes are more refined than ours. At the same time I do understand a difference between shows like The Sopranos are seen as higher quality than something like Jersey Shore, but at the end of the day if it’s entertaining what does it matter?

Disclaimer: I am not endorsing Jersey Shore as an entertaining program.

Sources

Thompson, Robert J., Television’s second golden age. Syracuse, N.Y. : Syracuse University Press, 1997

P2

The demand for content is often responded to with previously tried and tested formulas, as mentioned in Blog 1. I think there’s now less of a demand from the audience for new/engaging content, in place for something that is easily digestible and ‘mindless’ to watch – potentially due to the rise in multitasking while watching shows, as mobile phones, etc. steal our attention. This has given rise to reality TV and shows which copy the styles/themes of previous successes (e.g. Seinfeld and seemingly almost any comedy show focusing on a group in the last 20 years).

BCM289 Blog 1: How and why do reality television formats cross borders? What does this tell us about the modern media environment?

Reality TVs popularity has exploded in the last decade, with a new show seemingly popping up weekly at this point. The idea of seeing people doing ‘unscripted’ acts seems to be a strange fascination of people all around the world (just look at the  success of Big Brother, Idol and Survivor worldwide). Starting in the 1990s, reality TV has proven to be a media format which can be replicated internationally, while matching the original’s success. 

As most reality TV shows followed a tested formula (encourage drama between contestants, push contestants to breaking point for more views, show only the parts of participants personalities which will intrigue interest etc.), the formula can easily be copied and pasted in other countries, even where the culture is completely different (e.g. Big Brother Netherlands {original version} and Pinoy Big Brother, the Phillipines version).

While it would seemingly need to be adapted to fit the cultural differences, Fabienne Darling-Wolf argues in Imagining the Global that there’s been a “move from selling “finished” and, consequently, significantly culturally marked media products to selling more “culturally neutral” formats”, meaning that media formats often try to remove themselves from ‘cultural traps’ such as content that relies heavily on specific cultural references, thus allowing them success as ‘re-hashed’ shows in international and culturally dissimilar countries. She argues this “has eroded the relative economic advantage of powerful countries with the capital to develop extensive production facilities supported by a vast national market”. This allows smaller or less influential countries to create content (especially reality TV) that has the potential to reach international audiences, for example Netherlands with Big Brother). 

This tells us the modern media environment is quite uniform, favouring the use of successful and “culturally neutral” media formats as there’s a good chance for success, and potential for the franchise to experience (in some cases seemingly unstoppable) growth. This is one of the reasons there’s been so many remakes of all media formats (although not always successful). For example, hit UK show The Inbetweeners, had an American version, which although failing to make its mark, is an example of this idea of ‘rehashing shows’. Even if the show isn’t rehashed, many copycats with largely the same premise will likely pop up hoping to capitalise on the success of the format (e.g. The Masked Singer and The Voice or Idol, The X Factor, … got Talent, etc.). For marketing purposes it’s also much easier to be part of a franchise and be able to market a new show as a “international version of TV show”, as it’s likely that word of the show and some of its success will have been heard internationally.

While this makes the jobs of producers and executives easier, it ultimately reduces the ability for unique shows to be picked up by networks, as the risk associated with starting an untested formula outweighs the almost certain (at least to some point) success of a ‘rehashed show’.

Sources:

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/n/nmw/12748915.0001.001/1:4/–imagining-the-globaltransnational-media-and-popular-culture?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1

CAVA125 Visual Journal


Overview of the History of Photography and invention of the Photogram.

Timeline

1700s

Johann Heinrich Schulze– silver nitrate image of letters due to sunlight exposure – non-permanent image.

800wm.jpeg

Johann Heinrich Schultze (1687-1744), a German physicist, made an accidental discovery in 1725, where he found that silver nitrate impregnated on gypsum in a jar, when left exposed to sunlight, turned dark on the side facing the window. After exposure, if the bottle was shaken, fresh silver nitrate replaced the exposed material near the glass surface.

 

1820s
Joseph Nicephere Niepce (1765 – 1833) – sheet of pewter coated in a type of asphalt

time-100-influential-photos-joseph-niepce-view-from-window-le-gras-1

considered to be the first photograph – Niepce didn’t call it a photograph, but rather a heliograph, which comes from the Greek helios for sun and graphein for drawing

1830s

William Henry Fox Talbot (1800-1877) – salted paper photograms of botanicals and other objects.

Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 6.50.41 am.png

Hippolyte Bayard (1807-1887) – direct positive cyanotype images.

Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 6.48.36 am.png

Sir John Herschel (1792-1871) – astronomer, chemist and mathematician inventor of cyanotype and discovery of sodium thiosulfate as a way to fix the photographic image.

1850s

Anna Atkins (1799-1871) – “British Algae: Cyanotype Images”, first book that was illustrated using photography. Anne Dixon – worked with Anna Atkins on cyanotype photogenic drawings.

Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 7.31.45 am.png

Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen (1845-1923) – discovery of X-rays, photogram of human hand.

Roentgen observed that objects placed between the tube and the screen caused shadow images to appear on the screen, and that this occurred even after covering the tube with black paper to eliminate the possibility of the effect being due to visible or ultraviolet light. He then tested the idea that this might affect a photographic plate as it had the screen. This represented the first exposure of a photographic plate to x-rays and radio-graphic imaging was a reality.

Man Ray (born Emmanuel Radnitzky, August 27, 1890 – November 18, 1976). American photographer and painter. He was brought up in New York, and he adopted the pseudonym Man Ray as early as 1909. Man Ray made his “rayographs” without a camera by placing objects such as the thumbtacks, coil of wire, and other circular forms used here directly on a sheet of photosensitized paper and exposing it to light.
Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 7.34.22 am.png

 

László Moholy-Nagy (Hungarian pronunciationJuly 20, 1895 – November 24, 1946) was a Hungarian painter and photographer as well as professor in the Bauhaus school. He was highly influenced by constructivism and a strong advocate of the integration of technology and industry into the arts.Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 7.35.33 am.png


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTEMPORARY ARTISTS WORKING WITH CAMERALESS PHOTOGRAPHY

 

LEN LYE

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

SUSAN DERGES 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

ADAM FUSS

This slideshow requires JavaScript.


History of the Pinhole Photography

The Camera Obscura is a natural phenomenon and has a long history. In its simplest form, it is a small hole (aperture) through which light passes from an object outside into a darkroom. The image appears upside down on the wall opposite the hole.

HISTORY

  • Aristotle (fourth century BC) comments on pinhole image formation in his work Problems.
  • The basic optical principles of the pinhole are commented on in Chinese texts from the fifth century BC.
  • The Arabian physicist and mathematician Ibn al-Haytham, also known as Alhazen, experimented with image formation in the tenth century AD. He arranged three candles in a row and put a screen with a small hole between the candles and the wall. He noted that images were formed only by means of small holes and that the candle to the right made an image to the left on the wall. From his observations he deduced the linearity of light. (Hammond 1981:5).
  • In 1475 the Renaissance mathematician and astronomer Paolo Toscanelli placed a bronze ring with an aperture in a window in the Cathedral of Florence, still in use today. On sunny days a solar image is projected through the hole onto the cathedral’s floor. At noon, the solar image bisects a “noon-mark” on the floor. The image and noon-mark were used for telling time (Renner 1995:6).
  • The first published picture of a pinhole camera obscura is apparently a drawing in Gemma Frisius’ De Radio Astronomica et Geometrica (1545). Gemma Frisius, an astronomer, had used the pinhole in his darkened room to study the solar eclipse of 1544. The very term camera obscura (“dark room”) was coined by Johannes Kepler (1571–1630). At his time, the term had come to mean a room, tent or box with a lens aperture used by artists to draw a landscape. The lens made the image brighter and focused at a certain distance. (Adding a bi-convex lens to the camera obscura had been suggested by Girolamo Cardano in De subtilitate libri around 1550.) Thus this type of camera differed from the pinhole camera obscura used by Frisius in 1544. In the 1620s Johannes Kepler invented a portable camera obscura. Camera obscuras as drawing aids were soon found in many shapes and sizes. They were used by both artists and amateur painters.
  • During the 19th century several large scale camera obscuras were built as places of education and entertainment. The meniscus lens, superior to the bi-convex lens, improved the quality of the projected images. Some buildings or towers with camera obscuras from this period remain today
  • Sir David Brewster, a Scottish scientist, was one of the first to make pinhole photographs, in the 1850s. He was also one of the first to use the word “pinhole” in this context, or “pin-hole” with a hyphen, which he used in his book The Stereoscope, published in 1856. However, in 2009 Sam Morton, an 18 year old Scottish student, discovered that the word “pin-hole” was used in a similar optical context as early as in 1764 by James Ferguson in his Lectures on select subjects in mechanics, hydrostatics, pneumatics, and optics. Joseph Petzval used the term “natural camera” in 1859, whereas Dehors and Deslandres, in the late 1880s, proposed the term “stenopaic camera” (“sténopé-photographe”).
  • By the late 1880s the Impressionist movement in painting exerted a certain influence on photography. Different schools or tendencies developed in photography. The “old school” believed in sharp focus and good lenses; the “new school”, the “pictorialists”, tried to achieve the atmospheric qualities of paintings. Some of the pictorialists experimented with pinhole photography.
  • Pinhole photography became popular in the 1890s. Commercial pinhole cameras were sold in Europe, the United States and in Japan. 4000 pinhole cameras (“Photomnibuses”) were sold in London alone in 1892. The cameras seem to have had the same status as disposable cameras today – none of the “Photomnibuses” have been preserved for posterity in camera collections.
  • Mass production of cameras and “new realism” in the 20th century soon left little space for pinhole photography. By the 1930s the technique was hardly remembered, or only used in teaching. Frederick W. Brehm, at what was later to become the Rochester Institute of Technology, was possibly the first college professor to stress the educational value of the pinhole technique. He also designed the Kodak Pinhole Camera around 1930.

OVERVIEW OF XEROX ARTISTS AND SCANNER PHOTOGRAPHY

The photocopy machine was first used by artists involved in the International Mail Art Movement in the ’60s, as a quick and inexpensive way to produce spontaneous small-scale collages and works of art suitable for mailing.

In 1968 the 3M Company developed the first colour copier and soon after it was used for experimentation, fun and art by people placing any object that fit onto the glass surface of the machine.

Artist Sonia Landy Sheridan is one of the most important and well-recognised figures in the development of Copy Art. In 1968 she was hired by the 3M Company as an artist-in-residence for the purpose of developing their colour-in-colour machine for commercial, graphic and artistic use. Her technical innovations include experiments involving the control of time and light exposures, resulting in the stretching and compressing of an image.


CONTEMPORARY ARTISTS WORKING WITH FLATBED SCANNERS

DR CHANTAL FAUST

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

KATRIN KOENNING

SUNSHINE, VICSunshine, VIC

HONG HAO

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 


JOURNAL EXERCISES

PHOTOGRAMS

 

GREY SCALE – 3 second exposures aperture – 8.0

IMG_5010.JPG

 

OPAQUE IMAGE – 10 second exposure Aperture – 8.0

IMG_0133.png

 

OPAQUE AND TRANSPARENT IMAGE – 10 second exposure Aperture – 8.0

 

Scanphotogram

 

MOVEMENT IMAGE – 10 second exposure Aperture – 8.0

photogram.png

Process

For the photograms you lay your items on top of light sensitive paper, then expose the paper for a fixed amount of time. You can move objects as the exposure’s going or you can re-expose and move around items.

 

Analysis

I think the photograms were the most interesting exercise I did in CAVA125; it was very interesting to see how different objects can look as a photogram compared to a normal photo. I also like being able to do multiple exposures and make movement very apparent. After doing the photograms I’ve decided to use them for my major project, maybe with a combination of scanning in order to invert the images, which gives them quite a unique look in my opinion.

 

Reflection

I would have liked to be able to produce some more photograms and also be able to experiment more with them, but I’m excited to try experiment with it during the major project.

 


EXERCISE 2– DIGITAL PINHOLE

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Process

The process of shooting with a pinhole is almost identical to shooting with a normal digital camera apart from the lens. The lens of a pinhole camera is tiny, literally the size of a pinhole, which affects the depth of field and aperture, meaning the exposure with pinhole’s need to be exposed for longer than a normal photo.

 

Analysis

I feel like all of the photos taken with the pinhole camera were quite blurry and unfocused, which is the style of it, but not something I particularly like.  It’s also very hard to try and work out the framing of the photo, which doesn’t help with the usability and my experience with it.

Reflection

I think if I’d taken the pinhole to a different location I may have been able to get some better shots but also don’t feel like the digital pinhole process really suits my kind of photography and doesn’t produce the results I want.


EXERCISE 3 – SCANNING

 

BLACK BOX

Scan 16.jpg

MOVEMENT

NEGATIVE

Process

A scanner is very easy to use. All it takes is a Xerox scanner and objects to scan, then use Photoshop to scan the image onto the laptop and save the image. The longest part of the process is waiting for the image to be scanned.

Analysis

Using the scanner is quite exciting and gives off really good results if the composition is strong. I definitely want to use an element of the scanner for my major project – most likely making positives by inverting the negatives, to make the objects look almost like shadows.

Reflection

I really enjoyed the scanner and found it interesting how different things turned out with a really shallow depth of field and a very high resolution.

 


MAJOR PROJECT IDEAS

I’m thinking of doing a combination of photograms and scanners for my major, most likely using things I’ve found on the ground (rubbish etc.) mixed with naturally found things like flowers and plants to show a contrast in the natural world and the effect of humans in nature.

Inspiration26321624;960x1045.pngRebecaGF2PA.jpglou-landauer-photograms-of-seed---photogram-of-soap-bubbles-(2-works).jpg

 

SELF DIRECTED MAJOR PROJECT

I found myself changing my idea multiple times as I discovered the confines and limitations of scanner and photogram forms. This lead me to end up having a hard time making my concept concrete until the very end of the semester, which gave me additional time and stress constraints. Over all I feel like I produce a solid body of work with a good theme and concept, but if I had given myself more time, and just settled with an idea earlier on, that I could’ve made it slightly better and more coherent.

 

When we did the photograms I really enjoyed the process of it, especially working in the dark room and seeing your photo come to life when put through the developing baths but ultimately found that they didn’t really suit what my final idea was.

 

I found the scanner very interesting as well, in terms of what could be done with resolution, which was a large part of my decision to use it for the final project.

 

FIRST IDEA

 

Originally I wanted to do something that represented plastic and its impact on aquatic environments, after being inspired by photos like these.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I was planning to try and make these kinds of images through photograms, and then scan them and invert them in Photoshop, to try and make the most of the tools we were given to work with.

I quickly realised that this kind of look wasn’t easily achievable with photograms and scanners after a few tests, as they gave no depth of field and it was hard to make the props look decent. I also realised I was over complicating what I was trying to do, and needed to think about why I was using the method, and what implications came from that.

After talks with Grant, I decided that I needed to work out what angle I was going for, especially in terms of why I was using the process I was.

 

SECOND IDEA

 

After deciding I wanted to use the scanner I tried to work out what kind of scanner art I would do. I found this photo:

xerox-art-9801bef7-8789-4cc5-805b-c36bf8b3485-resize-750.jpeg

 

It gave me the idea of scanning a photo over and over again, slightly distorting it in a different way each time. Although I liked this idea, after a bit of deliberation with Grant, we figured that I could get the same effect by just using Photoshop and therefore wasn’t using the medium in its fullest form. I then found I only had around 2 weeks of class left to actually work out and try to print my idea. This caused me a bit of stress but also motivated me to see how effective I could be with the remaining class time.

 

 

THIRD IDEA

 

This made me try and work out what kind of art I could make with the scanner and what I could do to try and maximise the use of it. That’s when I thought of using the scanners resolution to try and find patterns in everyday items, the kinds of things you wouldn’t usually observe with the naked eye. With the intention of having a similar colour theme for a matching aesthetic, I looked for items that were red, yellow or orange. The idea came to me after I was looking around my room at had a match box catch my eye, as I saw the pattern on it, which I’d never taken any notice of before. This got me thinking about how I could produce essentially ‘macro’ images with the scanner due to its amazing ability to record detail. I knew that I had a solid idea after this and knew I just had to execute it properly within the time constraints.

 

My first tests we’re okay, but I found I needed to find more suitable items and retry the scans, which if I had been more organised and given myself more time, would’ve worked better. I enjoyed pushing the scanner to capture as much detail as possible, which made me very eager to continue working with it.

 

I ended up finding that it was harder to find items that matched up with each other, and maybe if I had given myself more time I would’ve been able to think about a series of items that would’ve worked together better but I still think given the circumstance I did well.

 

ARTIST RESEARCH

 

My inspiration for my first idea came a lot from artists making photograms, as it was the form I was most interested in at the time. I struggled to find artists that have used scanners to look at the details in everyday items but have found some along the way that’ve helped me develop my idea.

 

CONTEMPORARY

 

Rachel Thomson

 

I found her photos online while doing research, and her photos were the ones that originally inspired me for my first idea.

I wasn’t able to find a lot of information on Rachel, as she hasn’t had many articles or interviews online. There was a lot of her photos though and a small write up the series, which she called ‘Invasive Species’. I liked the way she turned plastic into an animal like from, turning something from the everyday into a meaningful series of pictures. I took this idea on for my second idea, taking the idea of turning an everyday item into something different.

 

Kim Preston

 

Although Preston didn’t use any of the forms we used this semester, I still found inspiration in the subject matter of her photos, especially in making plastic look like sea life. I wanted to try and use similar products to what she did but quickly found that it wasn’t possible.

 

 

Hong Hao

 

Hao use of a scanner if quite unique in the way that he captures hundreds of items in each scans. He records them in really high qualities as well, which I was inspired by and helped me further form my idea. As you can see, he makes patterns out of the items he uses, which also gave me an idea to look at patterns, just in a different form. All of his scans are really intricate and very well planned out, with every object looking like its deliberately placed.

 

HISTORICAL

 

Historically, there aren’t many artists that fit the style I ended up doing, so these artists aren’t as influential towards my work as the Contemporary artists were, but I found it helped me think of how many different ways a scanner can be used, which did help me eventually work out what to do.

 

 

Joseph Scheer

 

With an intention of recording high detail images of moths, Scheer gave me an incentive to look at the small things you’d often not give second thought. His work also helped me realise just how much detail a scanner can capture.

 

Additionally, all the artists I researched as part of the exercises helped me develop my ideas.

 

Len Lye helped me look at the abstract way camera-less photography can be used.

 

Chantel Faust helped me realise the unconventional ways a scanner can record an image.

 

ARTIST STATEMENT

 

My aim for my series of work was to show how in everyday life, there’s an unlimited number of unseen and unrecognised patterns, often invisible to the naked eye. By doing this I tried to show the full potential and ability of scanners and scanner art.

 

I tried to show what kinds of small patterns there are in everyday items, specifically those that you would see in a standard household. Aesthetically, I wanted the patterns to all be different but the colour scheme to be similar, in order to give it a matching visual, to make it feel like more of a series than just a random collection of photos in a high quality.

 

Instead of finding my concept then finding a medium to fit it, I found the medium I wanted to use then worked out the concept. I feel like this helped me be able to use the full capacity of what the scanners could do.

 

The main idea behind this series was to encourage people to look closer at what is around them in everyday life, rather than be lost in the moment and missing the small beauties of life. I wanted to put all focus on the detail, which is why I made sure to fill the frame with the object, not leaving any blank space.

 

 

BCM115 Assessment 2

In this audio piece, I have tried to continue the theme of a ‘rebel’ breaking away from what looks mean in terms of how they act and how they’re seen. I got inspiration for my piece from sound designers such as Pierre Schaeffer and Pierre Henry, as it helped me see how abstract and experimental audio could be yet still run and sound good.

 

I planned out my audio piece to run similar to my photo-essay I did for assessment 1 so I could develop parts of the rebellious character that I didn’t do well in the photo task (unable to represent the sound of a guitar through photos).

 

Seeing that one of the problems with my last task revolved around not being able to properly communicate the point, being able to have Jacob play guitar on this piece helped clear it up and also helped me with my original music composition.

 

I tried to make sure I kept the soundscape as minimalistic as possible and try to make sure all the sounds were natural, as even though experimental audio we looked at in class was interesting, I was worried I might overcomplicate it again.

 

 

Convergent Media Trends – Satire in Journalism

The Betoota Advocate – ‘Australia’s Oldest Newspaper’

 

Satirical news has gained a lot of popularity in the 21st century, especially as news and media is becoming increasingly delivered online. Satirical news is designed to mimic and mock genuine news websites and stories, presenting fictitious stories that make fun but also raise awareness of different issues and stories. Although satirical journalism has been in print media for a long time, the rise of the internet has taken the trend to new heights.

The Onion may have started the trend for satirical based news websites, starting back in 1996 but there’s no satire publication I think more prominent or more enjoyable than The Betoota Advocate. After seeing it slowly pop up more and more often on social media, I remember The Betoota Advocate becoming my first real interaction with satirical journalism.

Screen Shot 2018-10-28 at 2.05.51 pm

The Betoota Advocate was started by two former journalists (Archer Hamilton and Charles Single) in 2014. The website has quickly grown to become Australia’s most popular satirical site, with more Australian readers than The Shovel or The Onion, and has over 575 000 likes on Facebook and 335 000 on Instagram.

The Betoota Advocate delivers news stories with a humorous but serious tone to many of their stories. They’re quick to respond to social trends and breaking news, and their political and social commentary is consistently razor sharp. For example, they published a series featuring a character called ‘Uncle Tony’, soon after Tony Abbott accepted a role as an Indigenous Affairs envoy. After his dismal job with Indigenous affairs as PM, This series of articles also highlighted problems the Aboriginal community has faced, especially at the hands of the government, such as incarceration rates, racial profiling, and fatality rates. The series had over 30 articles based on the topic.

Other articles make light of topics such as Australian culture, and other content relatable to their audience.

Screen Shot 2018-10-28 at 2.18.19 pm

 

One of the biggest strengths in publishing satirical journalism is Betoota is able to pick and choose which stories they want to write about.  The success of the site boils down to their ability to scan through the news and put their own spin on current topics and affairs. Single said himself The purpose is to pretty much make the line between what’s real and what’s not even blurrier. It’s almost, in a way, trying to make sure all the bigger [media] players in the world constantly ask themselves are they heading down our path?”

While usually, the articles are obviously satirical, there are still some that have an air of plausibility and there have been cases where other media outlets have taken their articles for fact. For example, in 2014, Weekend Today ran a story based on a Betoota Advocate article about a Sydney city parking ranger who accidentally booked himself.

 

Screen Shot 2018-10-28 at 2.44.17 pm

 

The Betoota Advocate does well to not just write satirical articles but to bring issues in the news to light in a way that’s more entertaining to read than the day to day news.

 

 

Making (Module 3)

In the final stage of making our D.A., we saw our project come together much better than anticipated. Although we still haven’t gotten the audience interaction or reach we hoped to, we’ve still progressed our podcast more than expected.

Our project beta went well and we got further feedback we’ve implemented to continue progressing our project.

Our project followed F.I.S.T. (Fast, Inexpensive, Simple, Tiny) the whole time we worked on it as we wanted to make sure that, firstly, we followed as much of the criteria for the D.A. as possible and secondly, that we didn’t get too lost in making something we were inexperienced in.

As our Tutorial Guide for BCM114 states:

#bcm114 introduces you to key concepts in digital media making. The primary aim of the subject is to encourage experimentation and a speculative approach to media making. The secondary objective of the subject is to expose all BCM students to fundamental concepts in media making, including ideation, rapid prototyping and feedback-based iteration.

This has run true to my experience with this course and this project, as I feel I’ve been introduced to making a new type of media making (podcasting). Experimentation was a big aspect of how we progressed our D.A., as we went through different ideas for content, presentation, and logos throughout the 12 weeks we’ve worked on it. We also had to follow all the concepts of media making (as noted above) as without it was almost impossible to properly develop the artifact without doing so.

The making of the podcast after the Beta was no different to when we were prototyping apart from the fact we had a better idea of the direction our podcast was heading, making it more enjoyable to make and also much easier.

 

The making of our podcast generally goes like this:

  1. Find a topic to talk about / find people willing to have a beer and be on our podcast
  2. Record the podcast (generally runs around 15-20 minutes unedited)
  3. Edit podcast (takes around 30-45 minutes max)
  4. Upload to YouTube

 

Where to now?

Now that the Digital Artefact project has been completed I don’t think we’ll continue to make podcasts, not for now at least. Our audience definitely isn’t big enough to make it worthwhile (we currently have 3 Twitter followers, 2 Instagram followers and 7 YouTube followers) but I would definitely take the opportunity to recycle the idea for another project or use it in a different way if I had to.

 

Whats Hidden – JRNL102 Task 2

“There’s just something about him”

Behind the friendly face and sun-bleached hair, there’s something about Béla. Newtown born and bred, you can tell there’s something away from the public eye that’s so important to his character.

He’s many things – surfer, skater, artist, student, among more. He rarely stops, one day when talking to him he was just home from surfing for over 5 hours, even after a weekend of full of gigs and work. His roommate Mackenzie says she’s more surprised when she sees him home than when she doesn’t. This may give off the impression that he lives a frenetic lifestyle, but he’s undoubtedly in control of everything he gets himself involved in.

Its always astounded me how people have such busy lives yet have so much structure to them, so while sitting on his balcony one afternoon I asked Béla how he managed to constantly keep everything going. He gave me a simple answer – mediation.

 

 

It makes sense, meet him once and his relaxed persona will rub off on you, but it’s definitely something he keeps away from the public eye and for a fair reason. He says its one of the things he can do completely away from everyone else, especially in times of pressure or stress, but he also does it when he needs help to get him back into his own world. In Béla’s own words, meditation is something he uses to help ground himself.

It’s not every day he needs to do it and sometimes he barely manages to fit it into his busy schedule but while everything may be hectic in his life, Béla has his own way to keep control of it all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prototyping (Module 2)

The prototyping stage of the DA was hard to get off the ground. After trying to adapt the podcast to make it more suitable to a wide range of audiences, the recording of our actual podcast was delayed, putting us in a bigger rush and just making the task generally harder. I do agree with the notion that “in many respects prototyping is a key element of the media making process, as all previous stages are validated by the encounter with reality generated in this stage.” as I feel this stage was ‘make or break’ for our podcast (thankfully resulting in the latter). 

 

A Coffee With…

Screen Shot 2018-09-26 at 8.29.24 pm.png

A YouTube audio-visual podcast which allows an insight into everyday people’s lives, all over a cup of coffee.

 

There’s also Instagram (@a.coffee.with) and Twitter (@ACoffeeWith1) accounts to support the DA, which we’ve tried to use to get feedback and engagement.

We originally tried 2 directions with our podcast – a serious one and a more relaxed and laid-back approach. After deliberations and feedback from friends, we decided the later was a better option for the type of podcast we originally intended on making and so that’s what we decided to go with.

Our first idea was a podcast where we debate current topics (e.g. politics, currents affairs etc.) called DEBATABLE. We made one rough draft for it to see if it was a good idea or not as we were told to think about changing our idea after our project pitch. We used this to help us get comfortable with the equipment and the process of making and publishing a podcast.

We then made a draft episode for what turned into A Coffee With… featuring just Adam and I so we could introduce the episode and get to know the hosts. This was shown to a few friends and colleagues to see what their thoughts were on it.

The positive response we received indicated that we had a podcast that was ready to be remade. This idea is that the interview runs for around the same time you’d catch up with a coffee for. We also plan on making the interviewees a point of interest for our listeners rather than just a side thought, so the viewers get a better look into the lives of these people. Check the first episode here.

We decided to explore a range of different platforms and see what ones would be suitable for our podcast. These were the options;

  1. Soundcloud
  2. Youtube
  3. iTunes
  4. Spotify
  5. Podbean


The idea to use YouTube was due to ease of use, familiarity, popularity and the fact that it’s free to upload content. We also had an idea to use video in our task as we constantly found ourselves going to our computers for info so we decided to look into screen recordings to help give viewers a clearer idea of what we’re talking about. The three best recorders we could find were:

https://screencast-o-matic.com/screen-recorder

https://www.bandicam.com/free-screen-recorder/

https://www.apowersoft.com/free-online-screen-recorder

 

Our prototyping stage didn’t involve much work as we had a solid foundation from the previous podcast but we did have to change a few things. We also encountered problems with the audio where it would only record to the right channel which took time to solve and then we had issues with audio disappearing.

 

Screen Shot 2018-09-28 at 12.46.18 pm.png.

How am I meant to fix this????

 

Luckily though we got past both those problems in time.

 

Another change we had to make along with the name was a new logo.

Screen Shot 2018-09-28 at 12.21.19 pm.pngScreen Shot 2018-09-26 at 8.29.24 pm.png       Our new and improved logo….

Although I like branching out to other social media platforms to try to engage with our audience, we’ve found it’s been hard to get any real, solid interaction. This may be because of our delays, which put us behind other DA’s and made it harder to break through.

I think this DA has taught us both a lot about the need to FEFO (Fail Early, Fail Often) as it may have helped make our project easier. I think the fact that we’ve been scared to gain feedback from complete strangers has also been a weak point, as it’s easy to get feedback from friends but we may not have gotten as good feedback.

What’s next?

We’ve recorded quite a bit of content and intended to continue releasing episodes weekly. We’re both excited to continue making our podcast but we’re still trying to work out how we can edit it better, to get a more professional feel to it.

 


Making
We originally started the podcast, after our pitch, as a podcast debating current issues but found problems with originality and getting ideas for guests.

Breaking
We knew after our project pitch that we needed to change the type of podcast we were making so we decided to take the elements we liked (the podcast, guests, short) and implemented new things we liked to it (laid-back feel, wide topic range). 

Remaking
By the end of week 7, we had transitioned it into A Coffee With…, a podcast focused on the idea of getting to meet and interview someone similar to how you’d meet over a coffee, a casual chat with them learning new things. We like the idea because it allows us to get to a look into someone’s life without the traditional podcast questions. 

 

 

BTS

Screen Shot 2018-09-26 at 8.58.45 pm.pngOur Logic Pro X work station

 

 

Heres a few of our logos we tried out during the process.